On July 2, 2014 — The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) charged five short sellers who were traders for committing short selling violations.
Showing posts with label Securities Law Blog. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Securities Law Blog. Show all posts
Saturday, July 5, 2014
Monday, April 21, 2014
FINRA Issues $8 Million Fine for Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Failures
Securities Lawyer 101 Blog
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced today that it has fined New York-based Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (BBH) $8 million for substantial anti-money laundering compliance failures including, among other related violations, its failure to have an adequate anti-money laundering program in place to monitor and detect suspicious penny stock transactions. BBH also failed to sufficiently investigate potentially suspicious penny stock activity brought to the firm’s attention and did not fulfill its Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) filing requirements.
In addition, BBH did not have an adequate supervisory system to prevent the distribution of unregistered securities. BBH’s former Global AML Compliance Officer Harold Crawford was also fined $25,000 and suspended for one month.
Penny stock transactions pose heightened risks because low-priced securities may be manipulated by fraudsters. FINRA found that from Jan. 1, 2009, to June 30, 2013, BBH executed transactions or delivered securities involving at least six billion shares of penny stocks, many on behalf of undisclosed customers of foreign banks in known bank secrecy havens. BBH executed these transactions despite the fact that it was unable to obtain information essential to verify that the stocks were free trading. In many instances, BBH lacked such basic information as the identity of the stock’s beneficial owner, the circumstances under which the stock was obtained, and the seller’s relationship to the issuer. Penny stock transactions generated at least $850 million in proceeds for BBH’s customers.
Brad Bennett, FINRA Executive Vice President, Enforcement, said, “The sanction in this case reflects the gravity of Brown Brothers Harriman’s compliance failures. The firm opened its doors to undisclosed sellers of penny stocks from secrecy havens without regard for who was behind those transactions, or whether the stock was properly registered or exempt from registration. This case is a reminder to firms of what can happen if they choose to engage in the penny stock liquidation business when they lack the ability to manage the risks involved.”
FINRA also found that although BBH was aware that customers were depositing and selling large blocks of penny stocks, it failed to ensure that its supervisory reviews were adequate to determine whether the securities were part of an illegal unregistered distribution. FINRA Regulatory Notice 09-05 discusses “red flags” that should signal a firm to closely scrutinize transactions to determine whether the stock is properly registered or exempt from registration, or whether it is being offered illegally. BBH customers deposited and sold penny stock shares in transactions that should have raised numerous red flags. In concluding these settlements, BBH and Crawford neither admitted nor denied the charges, but consented to the entry of FINRA’s findings.
Investors can access BrokerCheck at www.finra.org/brokercheck or by calling (800) 289-9999. Investors may find copies of this disciplinary action as well as other disciplinary documents in FINRA’s Disciplinary Actions Online database.
For further information about this securities law blog post, please contact Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney at 101 Plaza Real S, Suite 202 N, Boca Raton Florida, (561) 416-8956, by email atinfo@securitieslawyer101.com or visit www.securitieslawyer101.com.
This securities law blog post is provided as a general informational service to clients and friends ofHamilton & Associates Law Group and should not be construed as, and does not constitute, legal and compliance advice on any specific matter, nor does this message create an attorney-client relationship. For more information about going public and the rules and regulations affecting the use of Rule 144, Form 8K, crowdfunding, FINRA Rule 6490, Rule 506 private placement offerings and memorandums,Regulation A, Rule 504 offerings, SEC reporting requirements, SEC registration statements on Form S-1 ,IPO’s, OTC Pink Sheet listings, Form 10 OTCBB and OTC Markets disclosure requirements, DTC Chills, Global Locks, reverse mergers, public shells, direct public offerings and direct public offerings please contact Hamilton and Associates at (561) 416-8956 or info@securitieslawyer101.com. Please note that the prior results discussed herein do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Hamilton & Associates | Securities Lawyers
Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney
101 Plaza Real South, Suite 202 North
Boca Raton, Florida 33432
Telephone: (561) 416-8956
Facsimile: (561) 416-2855
www.SecuritiesLawyer101.com
Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney
101 Plaza Real South, Suite 202 North
Boca Raton, Florida 33432
Telephone: (561) 416-8956
Facsimile: (561) 416-2855
www.SecuritiesLawyer101.com
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
OTC Markets Reporting l Securities Lawyer 101
Unlike securities listed on stock exchanges such as NASDAQ or the NYSE, securities may trade through the OTCMarkets interdealer quotation system whether they are Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reporting issuer or not.
There are three reporting standards for companies quoted
Tuesday, April 8, 2014
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”) grants broad authority to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to oversee the securities industry. The SEC’s authority includes the power to register, regulate, and oversee brokerage firms, transfer agents, and clearing agencies; as well as securities self regulatory organizations (SROs), including the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”).
In addition, the New York Stock Exchange, the NASDAQ Stock Market, and the Chicago Board of Options Exchange are all subject to regulation under the 1934 Act.
Thursday, February 13, 2014
FINRA Issues $8 Million Fine for Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Failures
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced today that it has fined New York-based Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (BBH) $8 million for substantial anti-money laundering compliance failures including, among other related violations, its failure to have an adequate anti-money laundering program in place to monitor and detect suspicious penny stock transactions. BBH also failed to sufficiently investigate potentially suspicious penny stock activity brought to the firm’s attention and did not fulfill its Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) filing requirements. In addition, BBH did not have an adequate supervisory system to prevent the distribution of unregistered securities. BBH’s former Global AML Compliance Officer Harold Crawford was also fined $25,000 and suspended for one month.
SEC Suspends Amogear, Inc.
On February 10, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) announced the temporary suspension, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), of trading in the securities of Amogear Inc. (“Amogear”), of Boston, Massachusetts, at 8:30 a.m. EST on February 10, 2014, and terminating at 11:59 p.m.EST on February 24, 2014.
The SEC suspended trading in the securities of Amogear because it has recently been the subject of spam e-mails touting the company’s shares and because of potentially manipulative conduct in the trading of the company’s shares.
Former Sheriff’s Deputy Sentenced in Ponzi Scheme Fraud
David N. Hawkins, a former sheriff’s deputy was sentenced to thirty months in federal prison for his role in a Ponzi scheme that raised more than $1.2 million from victims many of which were law enforcement personnel. Hawkins will also serve three years of supervised release upon completion of the sentence. Hawkins pleaded last year to one count of wire fraud and one count of money laundering.
Monday, December 23, 2013
SEC Charges Lance Berger In Connection With FUEG
According to the SEC, in December 2012, Lance T. Berger, a stock promoter for several penny stock companies, including FUEG, along with another stock promoter who was a business associate of Berger’s, began discussions with the cooperating witness regarding possible fraudulent stock transactions involving several issuers, including FUEG.
FUEG is a Florida corporation with principal offices located in Valley Stream, New York. FUEG purported to be in the business of operating an internet gaming website that charged a monthly membership fee. FUEG’s stock was quoted on the OTC Link operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc. and the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “FUEG.”
House Committee Passes Law Reducing Business-Broker Regulation
On November 14, 2013, the Financial Services Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives voted unanimously to report HR 2274, as amended, to the full House with a favorable recommendation. HR 2274 is known as the Small Business Mergers, Acquisitions, Sales, and Brokerage Simplification Act of 2013, and its intention is to amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Securities Act”) to provide for a notice-filing registration procedure for business brokers performing services in connection with the transfer of ownership of small privately held companies and to provide for regulation appropriate to the limited scope of their activities.
Under existing regulations, the same broker-dealer registration requirements apply to business brokers who assist with the sale of a small business to a purchaser who will be active in managing the business after sale and a securities brokers who engage in the offer and sale of securities of a publicly-traded companies to passive investors. Existing regulations fail to distinguish between these two activities despite the obvious need for differential treatment.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)