Why Companies Going Public Need a Securities Lawyer

Companies going public must comply with federal and state securities laws. Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and all state securities regulators require that all securities either be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or be exempt from registration.

Securities Lawyers Gone Wild – Todd A. Duckson

On June 2, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) announced that, on June 27, 2014, Judge Donovan W. Frank, of the U.S. District Court in St. Paul, Minnesota, issued an Opinion and Order imposing sanctions against securities lawyer Todd A. Duckson, a Minneapolis, Minnesota attorney, Capital Solutions Monthly Income Fund, LP, a Minneapolis-based real estate lending fund (the “Fund”), and Transactional Finance Fund

Carolyn Winsor Apprehended by U.S. Authorities

On June 27, 2014, Caroline Winsor, also known as Caroline Meyers and Caroline Danforth has been apprehended and is in the custody of U.S. authorities.  Winsor is  charged in an indictment with conspiracy, wire fraud, and securities fraud.   In April of 2013, more than a year before her arrest, Winsor was the subject of a detailed forensic report by www.promotionstocksecrets.com that contained allegations mirroring the governments charges against Winsor.

FINRA Issues $8 Million Fine for Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Failures

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced today that it has fined New York-based Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (BBH) $8 million for substantial anti-money laundering compliance failures including, among other related violations, its failure to have an adequate anti-money laundering program in place to monitor and detect suspicious penny stock transactions. BBH also failed to sufficiently investigate potentially suspicious penny stock activity brought to the firm’s attention and did not fulfill its Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) filing requirements.

In addition, BBH did not have an adequate supervisory system to prevent the distribution of unregistered securities. BBH’s former Global AML Compliance Officer Harold Crawford was also fined $25,000 and suspended for one month.

Penny stock transactions pose heightened risks because low-priced securities may be manipulated by fraudsters. FINRA found that from Jan. 1, 2009, to June 30, 2013, BBH executed transactions or delivered securities involving at least six billion shares of penny stocks, many on behalf of undisclosed customers of foreign banks in known bank secrecy havens. BBH executed these transactions despite the fact that it was unable to obtain information essential to verify that the stocks were free trading. In many instances, BBH lacked such basic information as the identity of the stock’s beneficial owner, the circumstances under which the stock was obtained, and the seller’s relationship to the issuer. Penny stock transactions generated at least $850 million in proceeds for BBH’s customers.

Brad Bennett, FINRA Executive Vice President, Enforcement, said, “The sanction in this case reflects the gravity of Brown Brothers Harriman’s compliance failures. The firm opened its doors to undisclosed sellers of penny stocks from secrecy havens without regard for who was behind those transactions, or whether the stock was properly registered or exempt from registration. This case is a reminder to firms of what can happen if they choose to engage in the penny stock liquidation business when they lack the ability to manage the risks involved.”

FINRA also found that although BBH was aware that customers were depositing and selling large blocks of penny stocks, it failed to ensure that its supervisory reviews were adequate to determine whether the securities were part of an illegal unregistered distribution. FINRA Regulatory Notice 09-05 discusses “red flags” that should signal a firm to closely scrutinize transactions to determine whether the stock is properly registered or exempt from registration, or whether it is being offered illegally. BBH customers deposited and sold penny stock shares in transactions that should have raised numerous red flags. In concluding these settlements, BBH and Crawford neither admitted nor denied the charges, but consented to the entry of FINRA’s findings.

Investors can access BrokerCheck at www.finra.org/brokercheck or by calling (800) 289-9999. Investors may find copies of this disciplinary action as well as other disciplinary documents in FINRA’s Disciplinary Actions Online database.

For further information about this securities law blog post, please contact Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney at 101 Plaza Real S, Suite 202 N, Boca Raton Florida, (561) 416-8956, by email atinfo@securitieslawyer101.com or visit www.securitieslawyer101.com.

This securities law blog post is provided as a general informational service to clients and friends ofHamilton & Associates Law Group and should not be construed as, and does not constitute, legal and compliance advice on any specific matter, nor does this message create an attorney-client relationship. For more information about going public and the rules and regulations affecting the use of Rule 144, Form 8K, crowdfunding, FINRA Rule 6490, Rule 506 private placement offerings and memorandums,Regulation A, Rule 504 offerings, SEC reporting requirements, SEC registration statements on Form S-1 ,IPO’s, OTC Pink Sheet listings, Form 10 OTCBB and OTC Markets disclosure requirements, DTC Chills, Global Locks, reverse mergers, public shells, direct public offerings and direct public offerings please contact Hamilton and Associates at (561) 416-8956 or info@securitieslawyer101.com. Please note that the prior results discussed herein do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Hamilton & Associates | Securities Lawyers
Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney
101 Plaza Real South, Suite 202 North
Boca Raton, Florida 33432
Telephone: (561) 416-8956
Facsimile: (561) 416-2855
www.SecuritiesLawyer101.com

Donna Levy Sentenced

On February 19, 2014, Donna Levy was was sentenced to 60 months in connection with her conviction for Conspiracy to Commit Securities Fraud and Manipulation for Hire on Counts and 66 months for Securities Fraud concerning Banneker, Cardiac Networks to run concurrently. In criminal cases when

Securities Lawyers Gone Wild l Russell Adler Charged

On March 7, 2014, Russell Adler, a former name partner in Scott Rothstein’s now-defunct law firm was criminally charged for funneling illegal campaign contributions to Senator John McCain and Florida gubernatorial candidate Charlie Crist.  Adler was charged with a single count of conspiracy to violate

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”) grants broad authority to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to oversee the securities industry. The SEC’s authority includes the power to register, regulate, and oversee brokerage firms, transfer agents, and clearing agencies; as well as securities self regulatory organizations (SROs), including the  Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”).

In addition, the New York Stock Exchange, the NASDAQ Stock Market, and the Chicago Board of Options Exchange are all subject to regulation under the 1934 Act.

FINRA Issues $8 Million Fine for Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Failures

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced today that it has fined New York-based Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (BBH) $8 million for substantial anti-money laundering compliance failures including, among other related violations, its failure to have an adequate anti-money laundering program in place to monitor and detect suspicious penny stock transactions. BBH also failed to sufficiently investigate potentially suspicious penny stock activity brought to the firm’s attention and did not fulfill its Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) filing requirements. In addition, BBH did not have an adequate supervisory system to prevent the distribution of unregistered securities. BBH’s former Global AML Compliance Officer Harold Crawford was also fined $25,000 and suspended for one month.

SEC Suspends Trading of Centor Energy, Inc.

On February 11, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) announced the temporary suspension of trading in the securities of Centor Energy, Inc. (“Centor”), of Winter Park, Florida, commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on February 11, 2014, and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EST on February 25, 2014.  The SEC temporarily suspended trading in the securities of Centor because of questions regarding the accuracy and adequacy of assertions by Centor, and by others, to investors in press releases and promotional material concerning, among other things, the Company’s assets, operations operations, and financial prospects. The SEC’s order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

Getting Funded 101

A private or public company can raise capital in a number of ways. Traditional sources of financing for companies include loans from branks or other financial institutions, receivable financing and  from friends and family. Private companies can also finance in going public transactions by selling securities in a Rule 506 Offering prior to filing a Form S-1 Registration Statement with the SEC. Going public is a milestone for any company and there are both advantages and  disadvantages of public company status. Companies going public do so because of the general perception that public company status will make it easier to raise capital.

The Laws That Apply to Finders

Companies seeking capital are frequently approached by finders who offer to locate investors in exchange for a fee.  This is particularly true in going public transactions. Most finders are not registered as broker-dealers with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

The possibility of receiving capital even through the efforts of a finder creates a tempting opportunity for issuers who need capital.

Matching companies with investors can be a lucrative proposition for the finder. While it may seem harmless enough, the SEC does not think so and in fact, the SEC frequently brings cases against unregistered finders and those who aid and abet them.

OTC Pink Sheet l Question and Answer

Q. What are the benefits of  listing on the OTCMarkets OTC Pink Sheets?

A.  There are a couple of benefits for companies opting to list on the OTC Pink Sheets.

Pink Sheet listings are much less expensive and the disclosure requriements are less stringent than a listing on the OTCMarkets OTCQB because audited financial statements are not required.  Despite that audited financial statements are not required, issuers who publish the information required by the OTCMarkets Pink Sheet Disclosure Guideslines provide transparency to investors and comply with SEC Rule 15c-211.

House Committee Passes Law Reducing Business-Broker Regulation

On November 14, 2013, the Financial Services Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives voted unanimously to report HR 2274, as amended, to the full House with a favorable recommendation.  HR 2274 is known as the Small Business Mergers, Acquisitions, Sales, and Brokerage Simplification Act of 2013, and its intention is to amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Securities Act”) to provide for a notice-filing registration procedure for business brokers performing services in connection with the transfer of ownership of small privately held companies and to provide for regulation appropriate to the limited scope of their activities.

Under existing regulations, the same broker-dealer registration requirements apply to business brokers who assist with the sale of a small business to a purchaser who will be active in managing the business after sale and a securities brokers who engage in the offer and sale of securities of a publicly-traded companies to passive investors.  Existing regulations fail to distinguish between these two activities despite the obvious need for differential treatment.

Boiler Rooms Are Back in Style

Everyone who’s seen the movie “Boiler Room” is familiar with how these operations work; for once, the film makers had no need to exaggerate.  Real-life boiler rooms are run by unscrupulous con artists who hire cold callers to sell stocks and other securities to their naïve and unwary victims, using extremely high-pressure sales tactics.

The classic boiler room is run by a broker-dealer that claims to be independent, specializing in stocks chosen by their “analysts,” who, they say, have conducted extensive due diligence on the issues.  In reality, the boiler room usually colludes with company management and/or insiders.  Often they own large blocks of stock obtained at very low prices; sometimes they paid nothing at all.  They will sell into their own promotion.